linux-kernel - Re: undefined behavior (-Wvarargs) in security/keys/trusted.c#TSS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1539274203.2623.56.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:10:03 -0700
From:   James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dhowells@...hat.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
        serge@...lyn.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: undefined behavior (-Wvarargs) in
 security/keys/trusted.c#TSS_authhmac()

On Thu, 2018-10-11 at 18:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/10/18, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I noticed that compiling with
> > CONFIG_TCG_TPM=y
> > CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM=y
> > and Clang produced the warning:
> > 
> >   CC      security/keys/trusted.o
> > security/keys/trusted.c:146:17: warning: passing an object that
> > undergoes default
> >       argument promotion to 'va_start' has undefined behavior [-
> > Wvarargs]
> >         va_start(argp, h3);
> >                        ^
> > security/keys/trusted.c:126:37: note: parameter of type 'unsigned
> > char' is declared here
> > unsigned char *h2, unsigned char h3, ...)
> >                                ^
> > 
> > Specifically, it seems that both the C90 (4.8.1.1) and C11
> > (7.16.1.4) standards explicitly call this out as undefined
> > behavior:
> > 
> > The parameter parmN is the identifier of the rightmost parameter in
> > the variable parameter list in the function definition (the one
> > just before the ...). If the parameter parmN is declared with ...
> > or with a type that is not compatible with the type that results
> > after application of the default argument promotions, the behavior
> > is undefined.
> > 
> > So if I understand my C promotion/conversion rules correctly,
> > unsigned char would be promoted to int?
> > 
> > We had a few ideas for possible fixes in:
> > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/41
> 
> I arrived at a similar patch as the one cited there, but it broke
> again after an 'extern' declaration was added in
> include/keys/trusted.h, so that has to be patched as well now

They look either over complicated or potentially problematic.  since
this is an internal API and a char * is always legal, what's wrong with
simply swapping h2 and h3?

James