linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] NTB: switchtec_ntb: Update switchtec documentation with pre-requisites for NTB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:36:41 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Wesley Sheng <wesley.sheng@...rochip.com>
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, corbet@....net, kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com,
        linux-ntb@...glegroups.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Wesley Yung <wesley.yung@...rochip.com>,
        Kelvin Cao <kelvin.cao@...rochip.com>,
        Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] NTB: switchtec_ntb: Update switchtec documentation
 with pre-requisites for NTB



On 2018-10-11 10:27 a.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I'm not sure who should really own this file:
> 
>   $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f Documentation/switchtec.txt
>   Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com> (maintainer:PCI DRIVER FOR MICROSEMI SWITCHTEC)
>   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> (maintainer:PCI DRIVER FOR MICROSEMI SWITCHTEC)
>   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> (maintainer:DOCUMENTATION)
>   linux-pci@...r.kernel.org (open list:PCI DRIVER FOR MICROSEMI SWITCHTEC)
>   linux-doc@...r.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION)
>   linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
> 
> and Jon (NTB driver core maintainer) has applied recent updates
> to it.
> 
> But in the interest of forward progress, I applied this patch with
> Logan's ack to pci/misc for v4.20.

Thanks. I'm not really sure what's going on in the NTB tree these days
as Jon hasn't picked up anything in a while so it's probably better this
went through PCI. It was originally created through the PCI tree, there
shouldn't be any conflicts, and I can't see anyone else objecting.

Logan