[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181012070000.GB28228@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:30:00 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] powerpc: Use cpu_smallcore_sibling_mask at SMT
level on bigcores
* Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2018-10-11 11:03:02]:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> + if (has_big_cores) {
> + pr_info("Using small cores at SMT level\n");
> + power9_topology[0].mask = smallcore_smt_mask;
> + powerpc_topology[0].mask = smallcore_smt_mask;
> + }
> +#endif
> /*
I dont see a way a system can have has_big_core set but use
powerpc_topology.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists