[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i3_2pxX48iZOwm+AyuU12E2g-bEnxNEaFURUsXyJpX3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:20:13 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@...eaurora.org>,
George Cherian <george.cherian@...ium.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...ica.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Base frequency attribute
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:46 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> This series presents base frequency to cpufreq sysfs when intel_pstate
> is in use in HWP mode.
>
> Changes:
> v2
> - Removed guaranteed attribute addition to acpi_cppc sysfs
> - Using the cppc_acpi interface to get base frequency and present
The code changes are fine by me, but what about documenting the new sysfs attr?
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists