lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 16:36:01 +0800
From:   Song Qiang <songqiang1304521@...il.com>
To:     jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
        pmeerw@...erw.net, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        preid@...ctromag.com.au, himanshujha199640@...il.com
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] iio: magnetometer: Add driver support for PNI
 RM3100



On 2018年10月12日 15:35, Song Qiang wrote:
> PNI RM3100 is a high resolution, large signal immunity magnetometer,
> composed of 3 single sensors and a processing chip with a MagI2C
> interface.
>
...
> +static irqreturn_t rm3100_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> +{
> +	struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> +	unsigned long scan_mask = *indio_dev->active_scan_mask;
> +	unsigned int mask_len = indio_dev->masklength;
> +	struct rm3100_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	struct regmap *regmap = data->regmap;
> +	int ret, i, bit;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> +	switch (scan_mask) {
> +	case BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2):
> +		ret = regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MX2, data->buffer, 9);
> +		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto done;
> +	break;
> +	case BIT(0) | BIT(1):
> +		ret = regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MX2, data->buffer, 6);
> +		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto done;
> +	break;
> +	case BIT(1) | BIT(2):
> +		ret = regmap_bulk_read(regmap, RM3100_REG_MY2, data->buffer, 6);
> +		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto done;
> +	break;
Hi Jonathan,

I just noticed that these three breaks are not proper aligned.

yours,
Song Qiang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ