[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d538f159-bc37-d4e9-3555-144232e361b1@embeddedor.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:06:41 +0200
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Spencer E. Olson" <olsonse@...ch.edu>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: comedi: tio: fix multiple missing break in
switch bugs
On 10/12/18 11:04 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 11/10/2018 20:05, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Currently, there are multiple missing break statements in two switch code
>> blocks. This makes the execution path to fall all the way down through
>> to the default cases, which makes the function ni_tio_set_gate_src() to
>> always return -EINVAL.
>>
>> Fix this by adding the missing break statements.
>>
>> Also, notice that due to the absence of the break statements,
>> the following pieces of code are unreachable:
>>
>> 1078 if (ret)
>> 1079 return ret;
>> 1080 /* 3. reenable & set mode to starts things back up */
>> 1081 ni_tio_set_gate_mode(counter, src);
>>
>> 1098 if (ret)
>> 1099 return ret;
>> 1100 /* 3. reenable & set mode to starts things back up */
>> 1101 ni_tio_set_gate2_mode(counter, src);
>>
>> So, by adding the missing breaks, this patch also fixes the problem
>> above.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1474165 ("Missing break in switch")
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1474162 ("Structurally dead code")
>> Fixes: 347e244884c3 ("staging: comedi: tio: implement global tio/ctr routing")
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_tio.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_tio.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_tio.c
>> index 838614e..0eb388c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_tio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_tio.c
>> @@ -1070,8 +1070,10 @@ int ni_tio_set_gate_src(struct ni_gpct *counter,
>> case ni_gpct_variant_e_series:
>> case ni_gpct_variant_m_series:
>> ret = ni_m_set_gate(counter, chan);
>> + break;
>> case ni_gpct_variant_660x:
>> ret = ni_660x_set_gate(counter, chan);
>> + break;
>> default:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -1090,8 +1092,10 @@ int ni_tio_set_gate_src(struct ni_gpct *counter,
>> switch (counter_dev->variant) {
>> case ni_gpct_variant_m_series:
>> ret = ni_m_set_gate2(counter, chan);
>> + break;
>> case ni_gpct_variant_660x:
>> ret = ni_660x_set_gate2(counter, chan);
>> + break;
>> default:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>
> Thanks for catching that bug!
>
Glad to help. :)
> Reviewed-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
>
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists