[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181012093243.GR9848@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:32:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/completion.txt: Fix a couple of punctuation nits
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:46:56PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 08:29:10AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:56:32PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> >> > This patch fixes a couple of punctuation nits which can make the document
> >> > more correct and readable.
> >> >
> >> > Also missing "()" are added to some function references for consistency.
> >>
> >> While there's nothing wrong here, any chance you want to try converting
> >> it to .rst and adding it to the overall index? It looks a lot like
> >> rst already.
> >
> > I, on principle, will not touch rst files. They are inferior to txt files.
>
> $ git shortlog --author=Zijlstra -- Documentation/scheduler/
>
> It does not look like you touch txt files either.
True; I prefer comments in the code. I did however write some text on
atomics the other day, see Documentation/atomic_{t,bitops}.txt.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists