lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 03:04:01 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Ning A" <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>
To:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: question about V4L2_MEMORY_USERPTR on 64bit applications

Hi,

I have question about V4L2_MEMORY_USERPTR on 64bit applications.

struct v4l2_buffer {
	__u32			index;
	__u32			type;
	__u32			bytesused;
	__u32			flags;
	__u32			field;
	struct timeval		timestamp;
	struct v4l2_timecode	timecode;
	__u32			sequence;

	/* memory location */
	__u32			memory;
	union {
		__u32           offset;
		unsigned long   userptr;   <<<--- this is a 32bit addr.
		struct v4l2_plane *planes;
		__s32		fd;
	} m;
	__u32			length;
	__u32			reserved2;
	__u32			reserved;
};

when use a 64bit application, memory from malloc is 64bit address.
memory from GPU (eg, intel i915) are also 64bit address.

when use these kind of memory as V4L2_MEMORY_USERPTR, address will be
truncated into 32bit.

this would be error, but actually not. I really don't understand.

BR.
Ning.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ