[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181012134721.GD23257@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:47:21 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Gustavo.Pimentel@...opsys.com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/40] Cleanup pci-keystone.c and Add AM654 PCIe
Support
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 03:51:15PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Add PCIe RC support for TI's AM654 SoC. The PCIe controller in AM654
> uses Synopsys core revision 4.90a and uses the same TI wrapper as used
> in keystone2 with certain modification. Hence AM654 will use the same
> pci wrapper driver pci-keystone.c
>
> The initial support for AM654 was merged recently [1]
>
> [1] -> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180626162615.19194-1-nm@ti.com/
>
> Patch series includes the following
> *) Merge pci-keystone-dw.c into pci-keystone.c so that we have single
> file for PCIe keystone driver.
> *) Cleanup the pci-keystone driver. In certain cases the DT binding is
> also modified since PCIe in keystone has never worked in mainline
> due to lack of PHY support.
> *) Included the PHY driver here for completeness (though the driver
> might go via linux-phy tree)
> *) Included the device tree patches here. Once this series is reviewed
> it'll be sent to be merged via Tony's tree.
> *) Patch to fix ATU identification for designware version >= 4.80 in
> designware core is also included here.
>
> TODO:
> *) Add Endpoint Support for AM654
> *) Send a patch to fix the MRRS after the correct value is identified.
>
> Once this series is reviewed I'll split the series and send to
> corresponding subsytem Maintainers after removing RFC in subject.
Hi Kishon,
I started reviewing the series, I noticed that some patches are
clean-ups that I would like to queue to cut the delta so that you
can rebase on top of them, do you have time to post the clean-up
patches (no functional changes) stand-alone so that I can queue
them up please ?
I think you should drop the RFC tag from this series.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists