[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6135DDE6-C8C1-420E-A264-7FD0AB60DE82@amacapital.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 07:57:50 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Andy Lutomirsky <luto@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC-resend 1/2] x86/compat: Adjust in_compat_syscall() to generic code under !COMPAT
> On Oct 12, 2018, at 6:42 AM, Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com> wrote:
>
> The result of in_compat_syscall() can be pictured as:
>
> x86 platform:
> ---------------------------------------------------
> | Arch\syscall | 64-bit | ia32 | x32 |
> |-------------------------------------------------|
> | x86_64 | false | true | true |
> |-------------------------------------------------|
> | i686 | | <true> | |
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Other platforms:
> -------------------------------------------
> | Arch\syscall | 64-bit | compat |
> |-----------------------------------------|
> | 64-bit | false | true |
> |-----------------------------------------|
> | 32-bit(?) | | <false> |
> -------------------------------------------
>
>
Yikes. This is probably even my fault!
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
And, if you want:
Apologized-for-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists