linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/thp: fix call to mmu_notifier in set_pmd_migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181012172422.GA7395@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:24:22 -0400
From:   Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To:     Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>
Cc:     jglisse@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        David Nellans <dnellans@...dia.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/thp: fix call to mmu_notifier in
 set_pmd_migration_entry()

Hello,

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:20:54PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2018, at 12:09, jglisse@...hat.com wrote:
> 
> > From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> >
> > Inside set_pmd_migration_entry() we are holding page table locks and
> > thus we can not sleep so we can not call invalidate_range_start/end()
> >
> > So remove call to mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start/end() and add
> > call to mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(). Note that we are already

Why the call to mmu_notifier_invalidate_range if we're under
range_start and followed by range_end? (it's not _range_only_end, if
it was _range_only_end the above would be needed)

> > calling mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start/end() inside the function
> > calling set_pmd_migration_entry() (see try_to_unmap_one()).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> > Reported-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>
> > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> > Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> > Cc: David Nellans <dnellans@...dia.com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/huge_memory.c | 7 +------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index 533f9b00147d..93cb80fe12cb 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2885,9 +2885,6 @@ void set_pmd_migration_entry(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
> >  	if (!(pvmw->pmd && !pvmw->pte))
> >  		return;
> >
> > -	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, address,
> > -			address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
> > -
> >  	flush_cache_range(vma, address, address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
> >  	pmdval = *pvmw->pmd;
> >  	pmdp_invalidate(vma, address, pvmw->pmd);
> > @@ -2898,11 +2895,9 @@ void set_pmd_migration_entry(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
> >  	if (pmd_soft_dirty(pmdval))
> >  		pmdswp = pmd_swp_mksoft_dirty(pmdswp);
> >  	set_pmd_at(mm, address, pvmw->pmd, pmdswp);
> > +	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(mm, address, address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);

It's not obvious why it's needed, if it's needed maybe a comment can
be added.

> >  	page_remove_rmap(page, true);
> >  	put_page(page);
> > -
> > -	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, address,
> > -			address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
> >  }
> >
> >  void remove_migration_pmd(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, struct page *new)
> > -- 
> > 2.17.2
> 
> Yes, these are the redundant calls to mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start/end()
> in set_pmd_migration_entry(). Thanks for the patch.

They're not just redundant, it's called in non blockable path with
__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(blockable=true).

Furthermore mmu notifier API doesn't support nesting.

KVM is actually robust against the nesting:

	kvm->mmu_notifier_count++;

	kvm->mmu_notifier_count--;

and KVM is always fine with non blockable calls, but that's not
universally true for all mmu notifier users.

Thanks,
Andrea