lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:29:33 -0400
From:   Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     "Deucher, Alexander" <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@....com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Maling list - DRI developers 
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon/r300: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

This and the r420 patch applied.  Thanks!

Alex
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:11 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "Pass through." with
> "Fall through.", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114734 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114735 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
> index 21161aa..652126f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
> @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static int r300_packet0_check(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
>                                           ((idx_value >> 21) & 0xF));
>                                 return -EINVAL;
>                         }
> -                       /* Pass through. */
> +                       /* Fall through. */
>                 case 6:
>                         track->cb[i].cpp = 4;
>                         break;
> @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ static int r300_packet0_check(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
>                                 return -EINVAL;
>                         }
>                         /* The same rules apply as for DXT3/5. */
> -                       /* Pass through. */
> +                       /* Fall through. */
>                 case R300_TX_FORMAT_DXT3:
>                 case R300_TX_FORMAT_DXT5:
>                         track->textures[i].cpp = 1;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ