linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 3/4] ARM: exynos: soc/mach for v4.20, second round

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:12:34 -0700
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        ARM-SoC Maintainers <arm@...nel.org>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 3/4] ARM: exynos: soc/mach for v4.20, second round

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 7:02 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On 10/10/18, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On top of previous pull request.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Samsung mach/soc changes for v4.20, second round
> >
> > 1. Disable SAMSUNG_PM_CHECK Kconfig feature incompatible with Exynos.
> >
>
> I suspect Olof made a small mistake when he pulled the previous branch
> into next/dt instead of next/soc, so I ended up pulling the new branch
> with all commits into next/soc again.
>
> Nothing harmful happened and you did everything right, I was just
> a bit confused by this.

Indeed, thanks for catching that.


-Olof