linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH security-next v5 00/30] LSM: Explict ordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:01:17 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Cc:     Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH security-next v5 00/30] LSM: Explict ordering

On Friday, October 12, 2018 3:19 AM, John Johansen
<john.johansen@...onical.com> wrote:
> It isn't perfect but it manages consistency across distros as best as
> can be achieved atm.

Yeah, this is why I'm okay with the current series: it provides as
consistent a view as possible, but leaves room for future improvements
(like adding "+" or "!" or "all" or whatever).

I'm curious to see what SELinux folks think of v5, though. I *think* I
addressed all the concerns there, even Paul's "I want my distro
default to not have extreme stacking" case too.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security