[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09127264-29ba-8037-38a4-a10acc6552ea@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:44:39 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] x86/fpu: eager switch PKRU state
On 10/12/2018 11:09 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> But maybe WRPKRU is more expensive than RDPKRU and a branch?
Yeah, it is more expensive. It has a higher cycle cost and it's also
practically a (light) speculation barrier.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists