[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b889a84a-8857-2dd3-3fad-1986a3fb47d8@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 20:12:51 +0000
From: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com" <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"pombredanne@...b.com" <pombredanne@...b.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
"bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
"rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"xiaochen.shen@...el.com" <xiaochen.shen@...el.com>,
"colin.king@...onical.com" <colin.king@...onical.com>,
"Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@....com>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"dwmw@...zon.co.uk" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"jroedel@...e.de" <jroedel@...e.de>,
"jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"dima@...sta.com" <dima@...sta.com>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] arch/x86: Rename the RDT functions and
definitions
On 10/12/2018 02:40 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 10/11/2018 1:33 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> @@ -883,20 +883,20 @@ static int __init intel_rdt_late_init(void)
>> rdt_online = state;
>>
>> for_each_alloc_capable_rdt_resource(r)
>> - pr_info("Intel RDT %s allocation detected\n", r->name);
>> + pr_info("RESCTRL %s allocation detected\n", r->name);
>>
>> for_each_mon_capable_rdt_resource(r)
>> - pr_info("Intel RDT %s monitoring detected\n", r->name);
>> + pr_info("RESCTRL %s monitoring detected\n", r->name);
>>
>
> I'm sorry - I know it was me who suggested the change to RESCTRL but I
> clearly did not consider the final result which is (for example):
>
> resctrl: RESCTRL %s allocation detected
>
> Perhaps we could just drop that RESCTRL text?
Yes. We can drop it.
>
> Reinette
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists