[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181012202633.xj5jkg753b6uf6s7@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 22:26:34 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] x86/pkeys: Drop the preempt-disable section
On 2018-10-12 11:07:28 [-0700], Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> All these "if" statements in the FPU code are messy and make
> understanding and reviewing this code hard.
>
> Can you prepare a patch for the beginning of your series that removes
> fpu->initialized and just ensures that the fpu is always initialized?
> This will regress performance, but you should get all that performance
> back with TIF_LOAD_FPU.
okay, will do.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists