[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181013203429.GE31650@zn.tnic>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 22:34:29 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>
Cc: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, keescook@...omium.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
indou.takao@...fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr
in immovable memory
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 04:19:59PM -0400, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> Baoquan and Chao, thank you for your comments!
>
> Boris, the patches has been merged to linux-next.
First of all, please do not top-post.
Even if they're in linux-next, that doesn't mean they should go upstream
while there are still issues to be hammered out.
In this particular case, if Chao Fan's patchset shapes up in a decent
form to be upstreamed, we don't need the cmdline parameter anymore, do
we?
Because we'll have the SRAT parsing and proper KASLR limits ready and
working automatically, I'd say.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists