lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181013060618.GQ32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sat, 13 Oct 2018 07:06:19 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@...il.com>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mszeredi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/34] teach move_mount(2) to work with OPEN_TREE_CLONE
 [ver #12]

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:17:54PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> +/*
> + * Object if there are any nsfs mounts in the specified subtree.  These can act
> + * as pins for mount namespaces that aren't checked by the mount-cycle checking
> + * code, thereby allowing cycles to be made.
> + */
> +static bool check_for_nsfs_mounts(struct mount *subtree)
> +{
> +	struct mount *p;
> +	bool ret = false;
> +
> +	lock_mount_hash();
> +	for (p = subtree; p; p = next_mnt(p, subtree))
> +		if (mnt_ns_loop(p->mnt.mnt_root))
> +			goto out;
> +
> +	ret = true;
> +out:
> +	unlock_mount_hash();
> +	return ret;
> +}

Umm...  The comment doesn't match the behaviour - you are
accepting references to later namespaces.  Behaviour is
not a problem, the comment is.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ