linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 078/366] xen/acpi: off by one in read_acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1539530741.867272694@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:25:41 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        "Joao Martins" <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
        "Juergen Gross" <jgross@...e.com>,
        "Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 078/366] xen/acpi: off by one in read_acpi_id()

3.16.60-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

commit c37a3c94775855567b90f91775b9691e10bd2806 upstream.

If acpi_id is == nr_acpi_bits, then we access one element beyond the end
of the acpi_psd[] array or we set one bit beyond the end of the bit map
when we do __set_bit(acpi_id, acpi_id_present);

Fixes: 59a568029181 ("xen/acpi-processor: C and P-state driver that uploads said data to hypervisor.")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
@@ -362,9 +362,9 @@ read_acpi_id(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl
 	}
 	/* There are more ACPI Processor objects than in x2APIC or MADT.
 	 * This can happen with incorrect ACPI SSDT declerations. */
-	if (acpi_id > nr_acpi_bits) {
-		pr_debug("We only have %u, trying to set %u\n",
-			 nr_acpi_bits, acpi_id);
+	if (acpi_id >= nr_acpi_bits) {
+		pr_debug("max acpi id %u, trying to set %u\n",
+			 nr_acpi_bits - 1, acpi_id);
 		return AE_OK;
 	}
 	/* OK, There is a ACPI Processor object */