[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181014054252.GA24103@light.dominikbrodowski.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 07:42:52 +0200
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@...il.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] pcmcia: allow PCMCIA support independent of the
architecture
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 05:10:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is nothing architecture specific in the PCMCIA core, so allow
> building it everywhere. The actual host controllers will depend on ISA,
> PCI or a specific SOC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Looks good to me, though I'm interested on any subtle (build) breakage when
this gets exposure in -next. Will you push this patch upstream directly, or
should it go in via the pcmcia tree? If it is the former, feel free to add
Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Thanks,
Dominik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists