linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] pcmcia: allow PCMCIA support independent of the architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 14 Oct 2018 07:42:52 +0200
From:   Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@...il.com>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] pcmcia: allow PCMCIA support independent of the
 architecture

On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 05:10:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is nothing architecture specific in the PCMCIA core, so allow
> building it everywhere.  The actual host controllers will depend on ISA,
> PCI or a specific SOC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Looks good to me, though I'm interested on any subtle (build) breakage when
this gets exposure in -next. Will you push this patch upstream directly, or
should it go in via the pcmcia tree? If it is the former, feel free to add

	Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>


Thanks,
	Dominik