linux-kernel - Relocation (type 4) overflow on alpha for big module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5bc11e00-258d-a6ea-fe63-ddcfdb847071@linux.ee>
Date:   Sun, 14 Oct 2018 10:07:13 +0300
From:   Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
To:     linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Relocation (type 4) overflow on alpha for big module

I decided to try btrfs on one of my alphas and got a surprise - btrfs module does not load:

modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'btrfs': Exec format error

dmesg has

module btrfs: Relocation (type 4) overflow vs btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier

Happens both natively on alpha:
binutils 2.30.0 (Gentoo 2.30 p2) and gcc version 7.3.0 (Gentoo 7.3.0-r3 p1.4)
or in cross-compiling:
binutils (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.31.1 and gcc version 8.1.0 (Debian 8.1.0-12)

btrfs.ko has size 2939856. Build-in btrfs initializes and tests itself just fine.

This seems to have happened in the distant past:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/axp-list/2005-March/msg00060.html

Do we have a similar binutils problem again with big modules?

-- 
Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>