[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1539530741.752314819@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:25:41 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Markus Elfring" <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 232/366] tracing: Deletion of an unnecessary check
before iput()
3.16.60-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
commit 16a8ef2751801346f1f76a18685b2beb63cd170f upstream.
The iput() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5468F875.7080907@users.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -552,8 +552,7 @@ error:
return ret;
fail_address_parse:
- if (inode)
- iput(inode);
+ iput(inode);
pr_info("Failed to parse address or file.\n");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists