[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1810150959290.10@nippy.intranet>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:04:27 +1100 (AEDT)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>
cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged
commands
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> Do we really need to make that distinction?
>
esp_reconnect() dereferences lp, so !lp has to inhibit disconnection.
At least, that's my reading. I can't see any other reason for the lp
conditional.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists