linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181015180437.6d06093c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 15 Oct 2018 18:04:37 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c

between commit:

  d91680e687f4 ("arm64: Fix /proc/iomem for reserved but not memory regions")

from Linus' tree and patch:

  "memblock: replace alloc_bootmem_low with memblock_alloc_low (2)"

from the akpm tree.

I fixed it up (the new patch hunk for this file is below) and can
carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
index d0f62dd24c90..c8ba593cc3ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -217,8 +217,8 @@ static void __init request_standard_resources(void)
 	kernel_data.end     = __pa_symbol(_end - 1);
 
 	num_standard_resources = memblock.memory.cnt;
-	standard_resources = alloc_bootmem_low(num_standard_resources *
-					       sizeof(*standard_resources));
+	standard_resources = memblock_alloc_low(num_standard_resources *
+						sizeof(*standard_resources), 0);
 
 	for_each_memblock(memory, region) {
 		res = &standard_resources[i++];

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped