[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181015095314.GA14428@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 02:53:14 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: Add note to CDDL-1.0 license that it
should not be used
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I'd rather replace the 'GPL-2.0' with something like '$GPL-COMPATIBLE-ID'
> and say explicitely in the prosa text that CCDL can only be used with OR
> and not with AND.
Maybe we should take the whole thing to a higher level, and split
the other folder into
legacy/
- for licenses that exist but should never be used for new code
and
dual/
- for licenses that should only be used for dual licensing with
something from preferred/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists