linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] soc/tegra: pmc: Turn powergates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7369869e-e58f-3760-d428-b00fb9cd28d9@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:52:26 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] soc/tegra: pmc: Turn powergates_lock into spinlock


On 30/08/18 19:36, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> This fixes splats like the one below if CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y
> and machine (Tegra30) booted with SMP=n or all secondary CPU's are put
> offline.
> 
>  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:254
>  in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 0, name: swapper/0
>  CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G         C        4.18.0-next-20180821-00180-gc3ebb6544e44-dirty #823
>  Hardware name: NVIDIA Tegra SoC (Flattened Device Tree)
>  [<c01134f4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010db2c>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
>  [<c010db2c>] (show_stack) from [<c0bd0f3c>] (dump_stack+0x94/0xa8)
>  [<c0bd0f3c>] (dump_stack) from [<c0151df8>] (___might_sleep+0x13c/0x174)
>  [<c0151df8>] (___might_sleep) from [<c0151ea0>] (__might_sleep+0x70/0xa8)
>  [<c0151ea0>] (__might_sleep) from [<c0bec2b8>] (mutex_lock+0x2c/0x70)
>  [<c0bec2b8>] (mutex_lock) from [<c0589844>] (tegra_powergate_is_powered+0x44/0xa8)
>  [<c0589844>] (tegra_powergate_is_powered) from [<c0581a60>] (tegra30_cpu_rail_off_ready+0x30/0x74)
>  [<c0581a60>] (tegra30_cpu_rail_off_ready) from [<c0122244>] (tegra30_idle_lp2+0xa0/0x108)
>  [<c0122244>] (tegra30_idle_lp2) from [<c0853438>] (cpuidle_enter_state+0x140/0x540)
>  [<c0853438>] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [<c08538a4>] (cpuidle_enter+0x40/0x4c)
>  [<c08538a4>] (cpuidle_enter) from [<c01595e0>] (call_cpuidle+0x30/0x48)
>  [<c01595e0>] (call_cpuidle) from [<c01599f8>] (do_idle+0x238/0x28c)
>  [<c01599f8>] (do_idle) from [<c0159d28>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x2c)
>  [<c0159d28>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c0be76c8>] (rest_init+0xd8/0xdc)
>  [<c0be76c8>] (rest_init) from [<c1200f50>] (start_kernel+0x41c/0x430)

Given the above, rather than converting to a spinlock I wonder if we are
just better off dropping the mutex completely from
tegra_powergate_is_powered()? Otherwise ...

> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> index 2d6f3fcf3211..d6bc9f66f1cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ struct tegra_pmc_soc {
>   * @lp0_vec_phys: physical base address of the LP0 warm boot code
>   * @lp0_vec_size: size of the LP0 warm boot code
>   * @powergates_available: Bitmap of available power gates
> - * @powergates_lock: mutex for power gate register access
> + * @powergates_lock: lock for power gate register access
>   */
>  struct tegra_pmc {
>  	struct device *dev;
> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ struct tegra_pmc {
>  	u32 lp0_vec_size;
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(powergates_available, TEGRA_POWERGATE_MAX);
>  
> -	struct mutex powergates_lock;
> +	spinlock_t powergates_lock;
>  };
>  
>  static struct tegra_pmc *pmc = &(struct tegra_pmc) {
> @@ -288,10 +288,10 @@ static int tegra_powergate_set(unsigned int id, bool new_state)
>  	if (id == TEGRA_POWERGATE_3D && pmc->soc->has_gpu_clamps)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
>  
>  	if (tegra_powergate_state(id) == new_state) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
> +		spin_unlock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int tegra_powergate_set(unsigned int id, bool new_state)
>  	err = readx_poll_timeout(tegra_powergate_state, id, status,
>  				 status == new_state, 10, 100000);
>  
> -	mutex_unlock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&pmc->powergates_lock);

... the above readx_poll_timeout needs to be converted to the atomic
version. Furthermore, the above 100ms timeout is probably not suited to
spinlock.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic