linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: owl: Fix warnings generated during build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181015171010.GL2400@vkoul-mobl>
Date:   Mon, 15 Oct 2018 22:40:10 +0530
From:   Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     afaerber@...e.de, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        liuwei@...ions-semi.com, 96boards@...obotics.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        hzhang@...obotics.com, bdong@...obotics.com,
        manivannanece23@...il.com, thomas.liau@...ions-semi.com,
        pn@...x.de, edgar.righi@...tec.org.br
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: owl: Fix warnings generated during build

On 08-10-18, 22:46, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Following warnings are generated when compiled with W=1,
> 
> drivers/dma/owl-dma.c:170: warning: Function parameter or member 'cyclic'
> not described in 'owl_dma_txd'
> drivers/dma/owl-dma.c:198: warning: Function parameter or member 'cfg' not
> described in 'owl_dma_vchan'
> drivers/dma/owl-dma.c:198: warning: Function parameter or member 'drq' not
> described in 'owl_dma_vchan'
> drivers/dma/owl-dma.c:225: warning: Function parameter or member 'irq' not
> described in 'owl_dma'
> 
> Fix this by adding comments for relevant struct members to appear in
> kernel-doc.
> 
> Fixes: d64e1b3f5cce ("dmaengine: owl: Add Slave and Cyclic mode support for
> Actions Semi Owl S900 SoC")
> 

This empty line is not required

> Reported-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>


Applied after removing the bogus empty line, thanks
-- 
~Vinod