lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-d8f1905a-8985-4797-b05b-b165b4ce91f1@palmer-si-x1c4>
Date:   Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
To:     sbates@...thlin.com
CC:     logang@...tatee.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        logang@...tatee.com, Andrew Waterman <andrew@...ive.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Michael Clark <michaeljclark@....com>, robh@...nel.org,
        zong@...estech.com
Subject:     Re: [PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: Implement sparsemem

On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:18:20 PDT (-0700), sbates@...thlin.com wrote:
> Palmer
> 
>> I don't really know anything about this, but you're welcome to add a
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
> 
> Thanks. I think it would be good to get someone who's familiar with linux/mm to take a look.
>     
>> if you think it'll help.  I'm assuming you're targeting a different tree for 
>> the patch set, in which case it's probably best to keep this together with the 
>> rest of it.
> 
> No I think this series should be pulled by the RISC-V maintainer. The other patches in this series just refactor some code and need to be ACK'ed by their ARCH developers but I suspect the series should be pulled into RISC-V. That said since it does touch other arch should it be pulled by mm? 
> 
> BTW note that RISC-V SPARSEMEM support is pretty useful for all manner of things and not just the p2pdma discussed in the cover.

Ah, OK -- I thought this was adding the support everywhere.  Do you mind 
re-sending the patches with the various acks/reviews and I'll put in on 
for-next?

>     
>> Thanks for porting your stuff to RISC-V!
> 
> You bet ;-)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ