linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Bluetooth: Add device_get_bd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:03:25 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc:     Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Bluetooth: Add device_get_bd_address()

Hi Marcel,

please let me know if any changes are needed to get this patch applied
to bluetooth-next.

Thanks

Matthias

On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:33:38AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:13:05AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:47:06PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > > On 9/27/2018 12:41 PM, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
> > > >   void bt_sock_reclassify_lock(struct sock *sk, int proto);
> > > > 
> > > > +int device_get_bd_address(struct device *dev, bdaddr_t *bd_addr);
> > > 
> > > Maybe change the API name to start with bt_ and get rid of device_?
> > 
> > device_ indicates that we get the BD_ADDR for a 'struct device' and
> > not for e.g. a 'struct fwnode_handle'.
> > 
> > Anyway with this version of the patch fwnode_get_bd_address() has been
> > scrapped and it might never be introduced again, so I'm open to change
> > the name to bt_ if there is a general preference for it.
> 
> Marcel, can you live with this being added to the Bluetooth code base
> instead of property? Also if you'd prefer the function to be named
> bt_get_bd_address() let me know.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Matthias