[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37401cea-5a37-2cd9-8595-8b07dfc4de7d@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:16:36 -0700
From: Enke Chen <enkechen@...co.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
"Victor Kamensky (kamensky)" <kamensky@...co.com>,
xe-linux-external@...co.com, Stefan Strogin <sstrogin@...co.com>,
Enke Chen <enkechen@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/signal: Signal-based pre-coredump notification
Hi, Greg:
> Shouldn't there also be a manpage update, and a kselftest added for this
> new user/kernel api that is being created?
>
I will submit a patch for manpage update once the code is accepted.
Regarding the kselftest, I am not sure. Once the prctl() is limited to
self (which I will do), the logic would be pretty straightforward. Not
sure if the selftest would add much value.
Thanks. -- Enke
On 10/12/18 11:40 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:33:35PM -0700, Enke Chen wrote:
>> For simplicity and consistency, this patch provides an implementation
>> for signal-based fault notification prior to the coredump of a child
>> process. A new prctl command, PR_SET_PREDUMP_SIG, is defined that can
>> be used by an application to express its interest and to specify the
>> signal (SIGCHLD or SIGUSR1 or SIGUSR2) for such a notification. A new
>> signal code (si_code), CLD_PREDUMP, is also defined for SIGCHLD.
>>
>> Background:
>>
>> As the coredump of a process may take time, in certain time-sensitive
>> applications it is necessary for a parent process (e.g., a process
>> manager) to be notified of a child's imminent death before the coredump
>> so that the parent process can act sooner, such as re-spawning an
>> application process, or initiating a control-plane fail-over.
>>
>> Currently there are two ways for a parent process to be notified of a
>> child process's state change. One is to use the POSIX signal, and
>> another is to use the kernel connector module. The specific events and
>> actions are summarized as follows:
>>
>> Process Event POSIX Signal Connector-based
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ptrace_attach() do_notify_parent_cldstop() proc_ptrace_connector()
>> SIGCHLD / CLD_STOPPED
>>
>> ptrace_detach() do_notify_parent_cldstop() proc_ptrace_connector()
>> SIGCHLD / CLD_CONTINUED
>>
>> pre_coredump/ N/A proc_coredump_connector()
>> get_signal()
>>
>> post_coredump/ do_notify_parent() proc_exit_connector()
>> do_exit() SIGCHLD / exit_signal
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> As shown in the table, the signal-based pre-coredump notification is not
>> currently available. In some cases using a connector-based notification
>> can be quite complicated (e.g., when a process manager is written in shell
>> scripts and thus is subject to certain inherent limitations), and a
>> signal-based notification would be simpler and better suited.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Enke Chen <enkechen@...co.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++
>> include/linux/signal.h | 5 +++
>> include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h | 3 +-
>> include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 4 ++
>> kernel/fork.c | 1 +
>> kernel/signal.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> kernel/sys.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 8 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Shouldn't there also be a manpage update, and a kselftest added for this
> new user/kernel api that is being created?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists