[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+S8fByq56DBrV3xQsoPmM9tXMa+Jm+ViuUcoTL3jM1OA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:15:22 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] sysctl: cap to ULONG_MAX in proc_get_long()
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Christian Brauner
<christian@...uner.io> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 9:27 PM Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> > int kstrtoul_bounded(const char *s, unsigned int base,
>> > char **trailing, unsigned long long *res)
>>
>> NO! The whole point is not have million variants of slightly different
>> integer parsing functions.
>> Cap it in the sysctl -- noone would care.
>
> (Please keep the CC list when replying.)
>
> Whatever works; I prefer the local strtoul_cap_erange() in kernel/sysctl.c as
> well.
This does match the standard of "evolution" for the kernel: there is
only one user currently, so keep it a static in sysctl.c. If we grow a
greater need, we can move it into lib/.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists