linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Fix misleading indentation reported by smatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3089039.JAYFEciPKB@avalon>
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:11:28 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
        zain wang <wzz@...k-chips.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Lin Huang <hl@...k-chips.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Fix misleading indentation reported by smatch

Hi Enric,

Thank you for the patch.

On Saturday, 13 October 2018 14:18:44 EEST Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> This patch avoids that building the bridge/analogix source code with
> smatch triggers complaints about inconsistent indenting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c index
> d68986cea132..75e2649d7515 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> @@ -1219,12 +1219,12 @@ static int analogix_dp_bridge_attach(struct
> drm_bridge *bridge) * plat_data->attch return, that's why we record the
> connector
>  	 * point after plat attached.
>  	 */
> -	 if (dp->plat_data->attach) {
> -		 ret = dp->plat_data->attach(dp->plat_data, bridge, connector);
> -		 if (ret) {
> -			 DRM_ERROR("Failed at platform attch func\n");
> -			 return ret;
> -		 }
> +	if (dp->plat_data->attach) {
> +		ret = dp->plat_data->attach(dp->plat_data, bridge, connector);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			DRM_ERROR("Failed at platform attch func\n");
> +			return ret;
> +		}
>  	}

This looks good to me. While at it, could you s/attch/attach/ ? With that 
fixed,

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>

>  	if (dp->plat_data->panel) {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart