[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181016170517.917484649@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 19:04:36 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 046/135] sfp: fix oops with ethtool -m
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit 126d6848ef13958e1cb959e96c21d19bc498ade9 ]
If a network interface is created prior to the SFP socket being
available, ethtool can request module information. This unfortunately
leads to an oops:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008
pgd = (ptrval)
[00000008] *pgd=7c400831, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] SMP ARM
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 1480 Comm: ethtool Not tainted 4.19.0-rc3 #138
Hardware name: Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC
PC is at sfp_get_module_info+0x8/0x10
LR is at dev_ethtool+0x218c/0x2afc
Fix this by not filling in the network device's SFP bus pointer until
SFP is fully bound, thereby avoiding the core calling into the SFP bus
code.
Fixes: ce0aa27ff3f6 ("sfp: add sfp-bus to bridge between network devices and sfp cages")
Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
@@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ static int sfp_register_bus(struct sfp_b
}
if (bus->started)
bus->socket_ops->start(bus->sfp);
+ bus->netdev->sfp_bus = bus;
bus->registered = true;
return 0;
}
@@ -357,6 +358,7 @@ static void sfp_unregister_bus(struct sf
{
const struct sfp_upstream_ops *ops = bus->upstream_ops;
+ bus->netdev->sfp_bus = NULL;
if (bus->registered) {
if (bus->started)
bus->socket_ops->stop(bus->sfp);
@@ -438,7 +440,6 @@ static void sfp_upstream_clear(struct sf
{
bus->upstream_ops = NULL;
bus->upstream = NULL;
- bus->netdev->sfp_bus = NULL;
bus->netdev = NULL;
}
@@ -467,7 +468,6 @@ struct sfp_bus *sfp_register_upstream(st
bus->upstream_ops = ops;
bus->upstream = upstream;
bus->netdev = ndev;
- ndev->sfp_bus = bus;
if (bus->sfp) {
ret = sfp_register_bus(bus);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists