lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181016170542.658704337@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 19:10:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 65/71] net: pskb_trim_rcsum() and CHECKSUM_COMPLETE are friends

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

After working on IP defragmentation lately, I found that some large
packets defeat CHECKSUM_COMPLETE optimization because of NIC adding
zero paddings on the last (small) fragment.

While removing the padding with pskb_trim_rcsum(), we set skb->ip_summed
to CHECKSUM_NONE, forcing a full csum validation, even if all prior
fragments had CHECKSUM_COMPLETE set.

We can instead compute the checksum of the part we are trimming,
usually smaller than the part we keep.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
(cherry picked from commit 88078d98d1bb085d72af8437707279e203524fa5)
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/linux/skbuff.h |    5 ++---
 net/core/skbuff.c      |   14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -2954,6 +2954,7 @@ static inline unsigned char *skb_push_rc
 	return skb->data;
 }
 
+int pskb_trim_rcsum_slow(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len);
 /**
  *	pskb_trim_rcsum - trim received skb and update checksum
  *	@skb: buffer to trim
@@ -2967,9 +2968,7 @@ static inline int pskb_trim_rcsum(struct
 {
 	if (likely(len >= skb->len))
 		return 0;
-	if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE)
-		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
-	return __pskb_trim(skb, len);
+	return pskb_trim_rcsum_slow(skb, len);
 }
 
 static inline int __skb_trim_rcsum(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -1578,6 +1578,20 @@ done:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(___pskb_trim);
 
+/* Note : use pskb_trim_rcsum() instead of calling this directly
+ */
+int pskb_trim_rcsum_slow(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
+{
+	if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) {
+		int delta = skb->len - len;
+
+		skb->csum = csum_sub(skb->csum,
+				     skb_checksum(skb, len, delta, 0));
+	}
+	return __pskb_trim(skb, len);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pskb_trim_rcsum_slow);
+
 /**
  *	__pskb_pull_tail - advance tail of skb header
  *	@skb: buffer to reallocate


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ