[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181016172107.GA230131@dtor-ws>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:21:07 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: uinput - fix Spectre v1 vulnerability
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 01:13:13PM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> setup.code can be indirectly controlled by user-space, hence leading to
> a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.
>
> This issue was detected with the help of Smatch:
>
> drivers/input/misc/uinput.c:512 uinput_abs_setup() warn: potential
> spectre issue 'dev->absinfo' [w] (local cap)
>
> Fix this by sanitizing setup.code before using it to index dev->absinfo.
So we are saying that attacker, by repeatedly calling ioctl(...,
UI_ABS_SETUP, ...) will be able to poison branch predictor and discover
another program or kernel secrets? But uinput is a privileged interface
open to root only, as it allows injecting arbitrary keystrokes into the
kernel. And since only root can use uinput, meh?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists