linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr in immovable memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181016191113.GI5212@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:11:14 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>
Cc:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
        indou.takao@...fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr
 in immovable memory

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:13:54AM -0400, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> Hi Boris, Baoquan and all,
> 
> I have created a RFC patch for adjust KASLR padding size.
> This patch is based on Can's v8 patch [1/3], and the Can's patch
> will be changed in the future, so this patch is just RFC.
> 
> Welcome to any comments and suggestions. Thanks!

...

> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
> index a06cbf019744..c987c725e93a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
> @@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ struct boot_params {
>  	__u8  _pad7[0x290-0x1f1-sizeof(struct setup_header)];
>  	__u32 edd_mbr_sig_buffer[EDD_MBR_SIG_MAX];	/* 0x290 */
>  	struct boot_e820_entry e820_table[E820_MAX_ENTRIES_ZEROPAGE]; /* 0x2d0 */
> -	__u8  _pad8[48];				/* 0xcd0 */
> +	__u8  _pad8[40];				/* 0xcd0 */
> +	__u64 possible_mem_addr;			/* 0xcf8 */

Where in the example I gave you with add_e820ext() do you see members
being added to struct boot_params?

Take a look at it again pls.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.