[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181016235120.138227-25-brendanhiggins@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 16:51:13 -0700
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, keescook@...gle.com, mcgrof@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org
Cc: joel@....id.au, mpe@...erman.id.au, joe@...ches.com, brakmo@...com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Tim.Bird@...y.com, khilman@...libre.com,
julia.lawall@...6.fr, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jdike@...toit.com, richard@....at, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Subject: [RFC v1 24/31] kunit: improved sigsegv stack trace printing
Sacrificed the control of printing stack trace within the crash handler
in the test runner for getting a better stack trace; this is still not
ideal, but much better than before.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
---
arch/um/kernel/trap.c | 11 ++++++++++-
kunit/test.c | 13 +++++++++----
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
index 9b97712daf14f..c3ff8346800c4 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
@@ -226,8 +226,17 @@ unsigned long segv(struct faultinfo fi, unsigned long ip, int is_user,
current->thread.segv_regs = container_of(regs, struct pt_regs, regs);
catcher = current->thread.fault_catcher;
- if (catcher && current->thread.is_running_test)
+ if (catcher && current->thread.is_running_test) {
+ /*
+ * TODO(b/77223210): Right now we don't have a way to store a
+ * copy of the stack, or a copy of information from the stack,
+ * so we need to print it now; otherwise, the stack will be
+ * destroyed by segv_run_catcher which works by popping off
+ * stack frames.
+ */
+ show_stack(NULL, NULL);
segv_run_catcher(catcher, (void *) address);
+ }
else if (!is_user && (address >= start_vm) && (address < end_vm)) {
flush_tlb_kernel_vm();
goto out;
diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
index 6ea60059b4918..5d78f76b421af 100644
--- a/kunit/test.c
+++ b/kunit/test.c
@@ -210,12 +210,17 @@ static void test_handle_test_crash(struct test *test,
struct test_module *module,
struct test_case *test_case)
{
- test_err(test, "%s crashed", test_case->name);
/*
- * TODO(brendanhiggins@...gle.com): This prints the stack trace up
- * through this frame, not up to the frame that caused the crash.
+ * TODO(brendanhiggins@...gle.com): Right now we don't have a way to
+ * store a copy of the stack, or a copy of information from the stack,
+ * so we need to print it in the "trap" handler; otherwise, the stack
+ * will be destroyed when it returns to us by popping off the
+ * appropriate stack frames (see longjmp).
+ *
+ * Ideally we would print the stack trace here, but we do not have the
+ * ability to do so with meaningful information at this time.
*/
- show_stack(NULL, NULL);
+ test_err(test, "%s crashed", test_case->name);
test_case_internal_cleanup(test);
}
--
2.19.1.331.ge82ca0e54c-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists