linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: uniphier: include <linux/bits.h> instead of <linux/bitops.h>

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZSDyTu3HJ-3MCgsRVizvuUsyLfPg08-Q5tZeZKTovNGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:02:19 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: uniphier: include <linux/bits.h> instead of <linux/bitops.h>

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 6:10 AM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:

> The reason of including <linux/bitops.h> here is just for BIT() macro.
>
> Since commit 8bd9cb51daac8 ("locking/atomics, asm-generic: Move some
> macros from <linux/bitops.h> to a new <linux/bits.h> file"),
> <linux/bits.h> is enough for such compile-time macros.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij