[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda-0nM1BHRza91=4tG5cKA7qL4H8wC3Syn9g37OJ0dUHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:03:09 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: uniphier: include <linux/bits.h> instead of <linux/bitops.h>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 6:12 AM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> The reason of including <linux/bitops.h> here is just for BIT() and
> GENMASK macros.
>
> Since commit 8bd9cb51daac8 ("locking/atomics, asm-generic: Move some
> macros from <linux/bitops.h> to a new <linux/bits.h> file"),
> <linux/bits.h> is enough for such compile-time macros.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists