linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] signal: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7f629a5a-b4e6-9daa-6ec3-f2d77027138c@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:23:33 +0200
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: Mark expected switch fall-throughs



On 10/15/18 11:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> 
> Yes, please. :) I love every step closer we get to being able to use
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> 

Yep. We are getting there. :D

> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 

Thanks
--
Gustavo