linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix Code of Conduct ambiguities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5cd87f8299de9fa0d2726a2d3fa2bdae349281be.camel@chavero.com.mx>
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:21:42 -0500
From:   Iván Chavero <ichavero@...vero.com.mx>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, corbet@....net
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Code of Conduct ambiguities

El 14/10/18 a las 8:46 p. m., Joe Perches escribió:
> On Sun, 2018-10-14 at 13:52 -0500, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> > The language and focus of the CoC has some ambiguities that
> > could lead to conflicts that might distract maintainers and
> > contributors attention from the technical nature of the
> > Linux kernel.
> > This patch aims to clarify this problems and focus the document
> > to a more possitive, healthy and technical standpoint.
> 
> []
> > diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> > b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> 
> []
> > @@ -17,23 +19,22 @@ Our Standards
> >   Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive
> > environment
> >   include:
> >   
> > -* Using welcoming and inclusive language
> > -* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
> > -* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
> > -* Focusing on what is best for the community
> > -* Showing empathy towards other community members
> > +* Using welcoming and inclusive language.
> > +* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences.
> > +* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism.
> > +* Focusing on what is best for the community:.
> > +* Showing empathy towards other community members.
> > +* Use facts instead of opinions.
> 
> trivia:
> 
> bullet points do not need periods.
> 
> 

When there are complete sentences the period is optional according to 
the Oxford dictionary [1]

if it's bad form i can remove them.


[1] https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/punctuation/bullet-points