lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:04:52 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Bartłomiej Żołnierkiewicz 
        <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc:     kgene@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: SAMSUNG: limit SAMSUNG_PM_DEBUG config option to
 non-Exynos platforms

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 17:50, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> "Samsung PM Suspend debug" feature (controlled by SAMSUNG_PM_DEBUG
> config option) is not working properly (debug messages are not
> displayed after resume) on Exynos platforms because GPIOs restore
> code is not implemented.
>
> Add PLAT_S3C24XX, ARCH_S3C64XX and ARCH_S5PV210 dependencies to
> SAMSUNG_PM_DEBUG config option to hide it on Exynos platforms.
> Then convert Exynos code to not require <plat/pm-common.h>
> header (use pr_debug() directly instead of S3C_PMDBG() macro and
> remove redundant s3c_pm_*() calls).
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - don't move PM to the line below in Kconfig
>
> v2:
> - convert Exynos code to not require <plat/pm-common.h> header
>
> Should by applied on top of "[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove no longer
> needed s3c_pm_check_*() calls".
>
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c |   14 ++++----------
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig  |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Thanks. This and the other one (removing s3c_pm_check_*()) look OK
although it is too late for another pull so this will wait for next
cycle.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ