[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01F789A9-AF3F-4226-B9D1-9BB160AC4947@catalogicsoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:37:58 +0000
From: "Ly, Bryant" <bly@...alogicsoftware.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: Fix target_wait_for_sess_cmds breakage with
active signals
Martin,
> On Oct 15, 2018, at 11:13 PM, Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>
> Bryant,
>
>> VMs do not remove the I_T nexus while the VM is active, so we can remove
>> the target_wait_for_sess_cmd() call.
>
> Patch forthcoming?
I can put out a patch, I’m trying to get someone at IBM to test it though.
-Bryant
Powered by blists - more mailing lists