[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181017034047.nrhstc3b4wzevnri@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 23:40:47 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netconsole warning in 4.19.0-rc7
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:34:49PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> (Cc'ing Dave)
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 5:14 AM Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee> wrote:
> >
> > Thies 4.19-rc7 on a bunch of test machines and got this warning from one.
> > It is reproducible and I have not noticed it before.
> >
> [...]
> > [ 9.914805] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/softirq.c:168 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x2e/0x44
> > [ 9.914806] Modules linked in:
> > [ 9.914808] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.0-rc7 #210
> > [ 9.914810] Hardware name: MicroLink /D850MV , BIOS MV85010A.86A.0067.P24.0304081124 04/08/2003
> > [ 9.914811] EIP: __local_bh_enable_ip+0x2e/0x44
> > [ 9.914813] Code: cc 02 5f c8 a9 00 00 0f 00 75 1f 83 ea 01 f7 da 01 15 cc 02 5f c8 a1 cc 02 5f c8 a9 00 ff 1f 00 74 0c ff 0d cc 02 5f c8 5d c3 <0f> 0b eb dd 66 a1 80 cd 5e c8 66 85 c0 74 e9 e8 87 ff ff ff eb e2
> > [ 9.914814] EAX: 80010200 EBX: f602b000 ECX: 36346270 EDX: 00000200
> > [ 9.914815] ESI: f620ecc0 EDI: f620ebac EBP: f600de40 ESP: f600de40
> > [ 9.914816] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010006
> > [ 9.914817] CR0: 80050033 CR2: b7f5f000 CR3: 36389000 CR4: 000006d0
> > [ 9.914818] Call Trace:
> > [ 9.914819] <IRQ>
> > [ 9.914820] netpoll_send_skb_on_dev+0xa5/0x1b0
>
> This is exactly what I mentioned in my review here:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=153816136624679&w=2
>
> "But irq is disabled here, so not sure if rcu_read_lock_bh()
> could cause trouble... "
Not sure why this didn't show up for me when I was developing that
patch, but I can now reproduce this. The patch below fixes it for
me, but I'm not sure if there are still any side-effects.
There's also a missed unlock in the error path.
If this looks legit, I'll submit it formally..
Tested on both bonded and unbonded interfaces.
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index de1d1ba92f2d..fafb9e2c4e7b 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -312,12 +312,13 @@ void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* It is up to the caller to keep npinfo alive. */
struct netpoll_info *npinfo;
- rcu_read_lock_bh();
+ rcu_read_lock();
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
npinfo = rcu_dereference_bh(np->dev->npinfo);
if (!npinfo || !netif_running(dev) || !netif_device_present(dev)) {
dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return;
}
@@ -357,7 +358,7 @@ void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
skb_queue_tail(&npinfo->txq, skb);
schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work,0);
}
- rcu_read_unlock_bh();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netpoll_send_skb_on_dev);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists