linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1 06/31] arch: um: enabled running kunit from User Mode Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:45:32 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Tim.Bird@...y.com
Cc:     kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, joe@...ches.com, brakmo@...com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, khilman@...libre.com,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        jdike@...toit.com, richard@....at, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 06/31] arch: um: enabled running kunit from User Mode Linux

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 2:18 PM <Tim.Bird@...y.com> wrote:
<snip>
> > There are some
> > other features we would like to add which would help with that goal as
> > well like test isolation. We actually have a presubmit server
> > internally for running KUnit tests that can usually respond to patches
> > with test results within a couple minutes. Would something like that
> > be interesting?
> I think the code and architecture of the software that handles presubmit,
> mail-list scanning, notifications, etc. would be of interest.  But KUnit features
> themselves (macro definitions, mocking vs. faking, etc.) would not.
> I only say that in the context of CC-ing the automated testing list on the patch set.
> Of course the KUnit features are interesting by themselves for testers doing
> unit testing.

Fair enough. Well, we will share what we have in that regard, but that
belongs on a separate thread.

BTW, what mailing list is that? I am also guessing your code isn't in
the kernel repo; where is it?