linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] Tools: hv: kvp: Fix a warning of buffer overflow with gcc 8.0.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181017050728.GF22447@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:07:28 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     kys@...rosoft.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
        olaf@...fle.de, apw@...onical.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
        sthemmin@...rosoft.com, Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Tools: hv: kvp: Fix a warning of buffer overflow
 with gcc 8.0.1

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 03:14:06AM +0000, kys@...uxonhyperv.com wrote:
> From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> 
> The patch fixes:
> 
> hv_kvp_daemon.c: In function 'kvp_set_ip_info':
> hv_kvp_daemon.c:1305:2: note: 'snprintf' output between 41 and 4136 bytes
> into a destination of size 4096
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: <Stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> ---
>  tools/hv/hv_kvp_daemon.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/hv/hv_kvp_daemon.c b/tools/hv/hv_kvp_daemon.c
> index bbb2a8ef367c..b7c2cf7eaba5 100644
> --- a/tools/hv/hv_kvp_daemon.c
> +++ b/tools/hv/hv_kvp_daemon.c
> @@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ static int kvp_set_ip_info(char *if_name, struct hv_kvp_ipaddr_value *new_val)
>  	int error = 0;
>  	char if_file[PATH_MAX];
>  	FILE *file;
> -	char cmd[PATH_MAX];
> +	char cmd[PATH_MAX * 2];

Overkill?