[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181017001206.GH230131@dtor-ws>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:12:06 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: xen-kbdfront - mark expected switch fall-through
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 04:07:48PM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through"
> part at the beginning of the code comment, which is what GCC is
> expecting to find.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114757 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Applied, thank you.
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
> index 594f72e..24bc5c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
> @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static void xenkbd_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> case XenbusStateClosed:
> if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
> break;
> - /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */
> + /* fall through - Missed the backend's CLOSING state */
> case XenbusStateClosing:
> xenbus_frontend_closed(dev);
> break;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists