linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/11] DT: arm64: exynos: add support for thermal trip irq-mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:04:26 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     l.luba@...tner.samsung.com
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, edubezval@...il.com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, corbet@....net,
        Bartłomiej Żołnierkiewicz 
        <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>, kgene@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] DT: arm64: exynos: add support for thermal trip irq-mode

On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 17:48, Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 10/16/2018 05:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 16:56, Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com> wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Hi Lukasz,
> >
> > Thanks for patches.
> >
> > I did not receive the first patches in the series. It is okay (depends
> > on the context) but in such case sending cover letter to all people is
> > quite useful. It helps to understand the entire patchset. Since I did
> > not get them, I really do not know:
> > 1. Whether DTS patches are independent?
> > 2. How this fits in the big picture of Exynos thermal?
> I have lost your email for my 'cc' command line, my apologies.
> I will add you in v2.
> Here you can find the cover letter:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=153970180314648&w=2
> regarding
> 1. they are independent
> 2. It will be less confusing and more coherent with documentation
> when we use 'passive' for DVFS cooling. Unfortunately, when 'passive'
> is set, it registers our trip points for polling and thermal schedules
> the work. I had conversation with Daniel regarding this setup,
> please check these email:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=153924620318766&w=2
> and my response:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=153933708316168&w=2

I see it on the linux-pm, I'll reply there.

Best regards,
Krzysztof