[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181017172226.7274498db2bbe3431c3f4057@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:22:26 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf's handling of unfindable user symbols...
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:45:06 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> So, I thought something had changed and in the past we would somehow
> find that address in the kallsyms, but I couldn't find anything to back
> that up, the patch introducing this is over a decade old, lots of things
> changed, so I was just thinking I was missing something.
>
> I tried a gtod busy loop to generate vdso activity and added a 'perf
> probe' at that branch, on x86_64 to see if it ever gets hit:
>
> Made thread__find_map() noinline, as 'perf probe' in lines of inline
> functions seems to not be working, only at function start. (Masami?)
Thank you for reporting it. Hmm, what happened when you did it?
I checked some points, but seems no problem.
(Would you see no line number? or defined event didn't work?)
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists